Home > Fatal Error > Fatal Error Asm/errno.h
Fatal Error Asm/errno.h
Also I'm pretty sure that the problem lies in one of the multilib packages not creating this symlink. Comment 6 by [email protected], Sep 11 2014 Processing Labels: -Pri-2 Pri-1 Hi, is there any update on this? There is a /usr/include/a.out.h and a /usr/include/linux/a.out.h. Then > stage 1 completed and the same error occurred at the begining of stage 2 > (setting just CFLAGS). this contact form
Is this a similar thing (have to install another 32-bit package)? Or it's a matter of fact that buildroot doesn't provides any guarantee on host packages? Offline #4 2010-12-20 12:18:22 schef Member Registered: 2009-04-16 Posts: 61 Re: Error when compiling: "asm/errno.h: No such file or directory" Thanks,I was searching for a soltion like GCC Path and something I bet /usr/include/asm is an empty directory on your system while it's supposed to be a symlink to x86_64-linux-gnu/asm.
See >> http://bugs.debian.org/638418 for details. >> > > Indeed it's an empty folder here. Hope this helps! Honestly there is no way I can have screwed up my installation, because it's cleanly pulled from git (rev. 591cb698d7768a52c1f1c527345782b500142edc).
- It's highly recommended when building stuff from source that you use --prefix flag (and with GCC, the --program-suffix flag) while configuring.
- How would you help a snapping turtle cross the road?
- Message #31 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply): From: François Revol To: Sven Joachim Cc: [email protected], [email protected] Subject: Re: Bug#638867: linux-libc-dev: errno.h includes non-existent asm/errno.h for -m32 Date:
- Obvious?" Why is it a bad idea for management to have constant access to every employee's inbox?
- Not the answer you're looking for?
- Clearly not the right fix.
- Please let me know if it > is necessary to attach the full log of the build. > > Any advice would be greatfully appreciated. > > Regards, > Blanca Comment
- But they are different!
- It usually compiles without a problem until this patch: luajit: needs for 32bit archictectures a 32bit host gcc So the host compiler doesn't look anymore for the 64bit version of linux-libc-dev
- A recipe for disaster. > > Clearly not the right fix.
If you don't have enough physical memory | > | your machine will start swapping to disk and the compile will not finish | > | within a reasonable amount How do investigators always know the logged flight time of the pilots? It's making host headers point to > target headers. Do not copy some file with a similar name from somewhere on your system (or, even worse, from somewhere else).
While we are at this, why on this beautiful planet are you building such an ancient compiler? Comment 7 eric 2012-07-03 16:12:57 UTC I had the same problem, and fixed it by copying "/usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/" from another 32bit system to your current system. Success! This riddle could be extremely useful Does chilli get milder with cooking?
Duplicate of bug #774215 Remove Convert to a question Link a related branch Link to CVE You are not directly subscribed to this bug's notifications. Isn't that more expensive than an elevated system? One of the package it uses is linux-libc-dev. You can find my .config attached. > > Can you also give more build output?
Is there a place in academia for someone who compulsively solves every problem on their own? recommended you read Tracing through the code: from src/v8/src/base/build_config.h:122 We can see that when building arm we need a x86 host environment. No success. –Meenor Sep 29 '14 at 20:49 | show 2 more comments Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Google Sign up I can't speak directly to Ubuntu 12.04, but in general you can download the linux sources as a package for your distro and it shouldn't require you to download/install gcc.
Request was from Debbugs Internal Request to [email protected] (Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:33:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available. weblink Build log below. > > cf. Please contact the server administrator, [email protected] and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error. It looks like there is something wrong with your system's toolchain installation.
A recipe for disaster. >> >> Clearly not the right fix. > > Yes, obviously, it was only an experiment to keep the build going to the end. > Unfortunately the Acknowledgement sent to François Revol : New Bug report received and forwarded. Comment 12 by [email protected], Sep 22 2014 Processing I had the same problem. navigate here Digital Diversity Why is the spacesuit design so strange in Sunshine?
How to cope with too slow Wi-Fi at hotel? Message #5 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply): From: François Revol To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: linux-libc-dev: errno.h includes non-existent asm/errno.h for -m32 Date: Mon, 22 Aug Copy sent to Debian Kernel Team . (Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:51:07 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
What emergency gear and tools should I keep in my vehicle?
See >>> http://bugs.debian.org/638418 for details. >>> >> >> Indeed it's an empty folder here. > > Remove it and either create the symlink yourself or reinstall the > gcc-multilib package. Physically locating the server Developing web applications for long lifespan (20+ years) In the United States is racial, ethnic, or national preference an acceptable hiring practice for departments or companies in How do investigators always know the logged flight time of the pilots? his comment is here Browse other questions tagged linux gcc or ask your own question.
Acknowledgement sent to Sven Joachim : Extra info received and forwarded to list. Subscribing... After following sugestions, I tried setting CPPFLAGS, CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS to -I/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu and then "-isystem /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu" when calling configure and the result was: at first CPPFLAGS was ignored and the same If it's the standard system compiler > it should know to look in /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu, if not then it's a bug > in the Ubuntu gcc package 4.5.2, which came with the
A bug in the Ubuntu gcc package confirms the fact that problems started after the upgrade. Not sure whether this package depends on build-essential or not though. –Aurelien Jul 27 '15 at 11:13 add a comment| up vote 0 down vote /usr/include/asm/errno.h is part of the linux The other is look in /usr/src/ to see if you have the kernel source downloaded; if not, see if there's a package to download it (like linux-sources maybe?). Edit: Steps I made: Extract gcc-4.8.1.tar.gz to a folder Open terminal window cd gcc-4.8.1 ./configure --build=x86_64-linux-gnu make -j4 I don't know what I did differently but it finally compiled.
That provides asm/errno.h Yes that is installed. > What compiler are you using to bootstrap? Comment 11 by [email protected], Sep 19 2014 Processing I guess we should update install-build-deps.sh or at least mention these extra deps in the BUILDINF.rst file. Comment 3 Richard Biener 2011-05-05 10:43:54 UTC This is an Ubuntu packaging issue (or you lack some package), not a GCC issue, as errno.h is a standard header. Note that this is #including my actual system header files (not NaCl-specific headers).
That is why we need the linux-libc-dev:i386 package. Regards, Blanca Comment 1 Blanca Mancilla 2011-05-05 08:48:29 UTC I succeeded in compiling by serring the following environment variables: export C_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu export CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu is this the right way? In file included from /usr/include/bits/errno.h:24:0, from /usr/include/errno.h:35, from ../../../gcc-4.6.2/libgcc/../gcc/tsystem.h:93, from ../../../gcc-4.6.2/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:29: /usr/include/linux/errno.h:1:23: fatal error: asm/errno.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. Not the answer you're looking for?
make: Leaving directory `/tmp/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libgcc' make: *** [all-stage1-target-libgcc] Error 2 make: Leaving directory `/tmp/gcc' make: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2 make: Leaving directory `/tmp/gcc' make: *** [all] Error 2 youngsai (10equals2) wrote on apt-get install linux-headers-3.2.0-2 shows it is installed. Thus: tar xf gcc-4.8.1.tar.gz mkdir gcc cd gcc ../gcc-4.8.1/configure --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr/local --program-suffix=-4.8.1 make -j sudo make install Now your GCC binaries will be installed to /usr/local/bin/, and other things in other Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com_______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot Angelo Compagnucci Reply | Threaded Open this post in threaded view