Home > Failed To > Failed To Identify I/o Error Err_mask=0x100
Failed To Identify I/o Error Err_mask=0x100
Take all the modules listed and add the to MODULES in /etc/mkinitcpio.conf. If you just want to enable a single CPU, use "maxcpus=1". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo [at] LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware ata3.00: failed to IDENTIFY User Name Remember Me? Password Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues. Check This Out
Offline #2 2006-09-27 16:39:12 Chocobo Member Registered: 2006-09-26 Posts: 24 Re: ata2: port failed to respond (30 secs) and ata2: SRST failed OK, I think I am going to post this macemoneta View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries View LQ Wiki Contributions Visit macemoneta's homepage! This got me through the install and everything. Thanks a bunch!!
Notices Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community. Rename the /boot(flash)/config/plugins directory. 2. I guess that means that this patch is not acceptable atm. Offline #21 2006-12-11 21:48:57 ralvy Member From: Santa Monica, California Registered: 2004-12-06 Posts: 275 Re: ata2: port failed to respond (30 secs) and ata2: SRST failed After appending 'earlymodules=piix' to my
- Global Moderator Hero Member Posts: 18900 Re: Is error log showing HDD Problems? « Reply #7 on: May 24, 2013, 04:13:19 AM » Quote from: Kandinsky on May 24, 2013, 01:47:51
- Global Moderator Hero Member Posts: 18900 Re: Is error log showing HDD Problems? « Reply #5 on: May 23, 2013, 10:25:03 PM » Quote from: dgaschk on May 23, 2013, 04:52:14
- Reason: SOLVED Adv Reply August 8th, 2008 #2 mc4man View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message .
- Something with > > > interrupt routing/IPI, missing irq ack?
- I don't get how that would be the case.
- Join our community today!
- still the issue is seen.
Try a new SATA cable. Thanks. Something with > interrupt routing/IPI, missing irq ack? Comment 5 Ronny.Hegewald 2015-02-23 23:40:45 UTC Created attachment 168091 [details] Patch 1 Comment 6 Ronny.Hegewald 2015-02-23 23:41:57 UTC Created attachment 168101 [details] Patch 2 Comment 7 Ronny.Hegewald 2015-02-23 23:43:08 UTC Created
Contact Us - Advertising Info - Rules - LQ Merchandise - Donations - Contributing Member - LQ Sitemap - Main Menu Linux Forum Android Forum Chrome OS Forum Search LQ Seems like the driver timedout and shutoff the adapter on encountering a bad drive. Just a quick follow-up. Even though they eventually fixed their driver by other means , it may be time to make tag order mode opt-in.
It is difficult to match ata numbers with device names or sd letter assignment. Home | New | Browse | Search | [?] | Reports | Help | NewAccount | Log In [x] | Forgot Password Login: [x] On regular bootups, I get this message: ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xf8850100 ctl 0x00000000 bmdma 0x00000000 irq 218 ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xf8850180 ctl 0x00000000 bmdma 0x00000000 irq 218 It could even be that we're seeing a bug in sata_sil24 not a hardware issue.
DIfference is it hangs forever in ata2, so upgrading to 2.6.18 is impossible at this time.LKM has posts on this same issue and it appears to be limited to ICH5/6/7 controllers, The time now is 02:03 PM. I don't get how that would be the case. I did some more testing and found that the problems only occur when commands are send on tags 3 and 25.
it has like 2 sata6gbps and 2sata3gbps ports. his comment is here deepclutch23rd June 2012, 10:38 AMfine.thank You @george, @Yellowman. It's also possible that one of your drives, for example the DVD, has failed and is no longer responding properly. I haven't tried the firmware update issued by Liteon yet.
All of the drive designations should begin with sd. Lime Technology - unRAID Server Community Welcome, Guest. If that's the case there may be a workaround other than the all-generic.... this contact form At this point the messages have ceased and the DVD drive no longer exists.
Two of the drives, hda and hdb, are not configured as AHCI in BIOS. ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300) ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xec) ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4) ata1: port is slow to respond, please be patient Jun 21 21:19:44 localhost kernel: [ 1.026862] ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) Jun 21 21:19:44 localhost kernel: [ 1.026981] ata3: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl
Offline #23 2006-12-12 04:03:54 ralvy Member From: Santa Monica, California Registered: 2004-12-06 Posts: 275 Re: ata2: port failed to respond (30 secs) and ata2: SRST failed I'm not sure I understand
Booting another !SMP kernel > works fine. Obviously there is a performance hit when you use the all_generic_ide option. Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Now run "mkinitcpio -g /boot/kernel26-test.img" as root, and set your bootloader to use that image.
Offline #15 2006-10-02 19:53:02 Neuro Member From: Poland Registered: 2005-10-12 Posts: 352 Re: ata2: port failed to respond (30 secs) and ata2: SRST failed Ok, got it: libata version 2.00 loaded. It's impossible that I have that since I bought the hardware in January of 2011. Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in. http://bashprofile.net/failed-to/failed-to-identify-i-o-error-err-mask.html Do you want to help us debug the posting issues ? < is the place to report it, thanks !
While booting I see some error message related to sata some times. Last edited by mortalic; August 9th, 2008 at 06:44 AM. His disk is SATA and I think that his cdrom is also. Can someone point me in a good direction for further reading?
Replace the "ata_piix" module with just "piix". I.e. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know. noapic works fine.
Let me know what other information I can post! Since it looks like you use ubuntu, run 'sudo lshw' from command line, then post the results in here. http://phraktured.net Offline #7 2006-09-29 16:49:39 ralvez Member From: Canada Registered: 2005-12-06 Posts: 1,557 Website Re: ata2: port failed to respond (30 secs) and ata2: SRST failed phrakture I have the same Now that the kernel has gone current i have the same problem again and can't get it back has anything changed since the kernel was moved to current?
Something with interrupt routing/IPI, missing irq ack?